The following questions were proposed by MS1 students and answered by a combination of MS3 and MS4 students:
For those who did multiple research projects, when did you fit them all in?
Sometimes there are natural ebbs and flows with projects and so when doing multiple projects, there naturally will be busier or less busier times. For example, while one project was going through the IRB, I would just focus on the other project. Deadlines can play into this. If you are submitting an abstract for a conference on one project, I would prioritize that one in the moment. Otherwise, I just do it based on when I have time to focus on research and alternate which project I work on when I have the time.
If I have multiple research interests, how do I decide which one to do for the MSA and which should I do independently?
I don't think there is a right or wrong way to go about this. For an MSA, it might be helpful to work on a project that is already established or in the works and moving forward so that you don't have to start from the ground up, which will make it a little easier to hit milestones, primarily the 4th year capstone presentation, and ensure you complete your MSA. But beyond that, there isn't a "better" research interest or project than others to do as an MSA.
What are some pros vs cons of research track? If we want a competitive specialty, is it better to do that track?
Pros- Funding. You get funding for three research blocks (one in the summer between 1st and 2nd year and the other two in 3rd/4th year), the Carmel conference, and a national conference. Milestones. It is nice to be working towards concrete goals like an abstract to a national conference and a first author manuscript. It is also nice since the research mentor is on the same page by engaging in the research track and so the project is more likely to hit these goals. Mentorship. I have a great mentor/mentee relationship with my mentor and it started in October/November of my first year which is really cool.
Cons- Project choice. The mentor/project is selected by you from a list of approved mentor/projects. It worked out where I found a project that was a great fit for me but that could be a potential barrier if you don't quite find what you are looking for on the list. Research blocks. The research blocks are required. I didn't mind that at all and would have done research blocks anyways, but it is something to consider that you have to do the blocks, especially in the summer between your first and second year.
As for competitive specialties, I don't think you have to do the research track to do a competitive specialty. I think the milestones you are reaching can align with competitive specialties potentially wanting to see certain research milestones and outputs. However, you can accomplish research goals outside of the research track. There are competitive specialties listed as approved mentor/projects for the research track so it could work out but is not required.
If we have absolutely no idea what kind of medicine we’re going to end up in, what sort of project do you recommend we peruse? Thank you!
That is totally fair! I think primarily think about something you are passionate about and would enjoy working on such as topics on sexual health or vaccines or advocacy work. It might be worth it to not think about the specialty exactly but what kind of work you want to do and then go about it that way. Also, think about whether you like bench research vs clinical research. Would you want to distribute surveys, do chart review, or run PCRs? Thinking about the broader topics and the day to day of what you actually would be doing might be a good approach for you more than trying to target a specific specialty. You will learn a lot and gain experience in whatever you do even if it doesn't end up aligning with the specialty you ultimately decide on.
When is the deadline for MSA?
There is a paper (or proof of publication) due in December of MS4 and a required capstone presentation due in spring of MS4, but you can complete the assignments earlier as your project progresses.
For those in global health track, were you able to do international rotations yet through global health and if so what where they like? Also, how does the school support you in finding or participating in those rotations? Can you talk a little bit about your experience in the Global Health Track? For global health - what gain do you get from being on this track vs just doing global health related research on the side
I'm in the global health track and did a 6wk trauma rotation in Cape Town during the discovery period after first year (CU South Africa Emergency Medicine Program)! It was an incredible experience, and to my knowledge is currently only open to members of the GHT. The Center for Global Health supported me with scholarship funds (covered most of my costs) and has many scholarship opportunities every year for students pursuing international experiences. A huge perk of the track is just having the opportunity to participate in in-country international research/clinical experiences (which you can only do under the official CU umbrella if you are part of the track) and being closely connected to CU faculty working in global health.
I personally did not do an international rotation, as my research was domestic. I will say that CU and the track have robust connections to sites all over the world, like the South Africa site mentioned above. The track co-directors are great at connecting students to mentors working in those sites, which is a definite advantage of being in the track vs trying to get international research independently. As for cost, there are several scholarships the track will connect students with. There will occasionally be incidental costs the student will have to cover, and there is no guarantee the student will receive the scholarship. However, the track will work with students to best figure out finances.
I did not do an international project through GHT (my MSA project is local), but I am hopeful that I can coordinate research-related travel sometime during 4th year if it all works out (there is plenty of flexibility in the curriculum after STEP 2)! I absolutely plan to rely on the co-directors to help facilitate this (help with connections, logistics, finding funding, and so much more), which is a huge advantage of being in the track