Welcome to the National Center on Family Group Decision Making

logo-nationalcenteron-fgdm
fgdm-header-1

Promoting the Rights of Family Groups to Make Decisions


Each year there are millions of children and youth who come to the attention of child welfare, juvenile justice, school counselors/social workers, health care providers and other public/private agencies. Traditionally, at best, many systems have worked only with the children and their current caregivers to resolve the concerns that brought them to the agency’s attention, and at worse, have excluded or marginalized the voices of caregivers, children and their extended family systems. Family group decision making (FGDM)—an innovative social reform championed worldwide since the early 1990s—challenges this paradigm and practice, resulting in an inclusive and participatory process that positions family groups to lead decisions about their own members.


Making Sense of Family Group Conferencing


Our relational activist colleagues produced this inspiring video called, Making Sense of Family Group Conferencing. Activists, advocates, social workers and researchers across the world bring to life the reasons systems should pursue family group conferences to spark meaningful change. It is a reminder that change happens through personal and informal relationships. It showcases the family group conference as one practice that is the embodiment of relational activism.

Watch the video, featuring Associate Professor and Director of National Center on Family Group Decision Making, Lisa Merkel-Holguin at here.


Core Elements of FGDM Processes


FGDM processes are carefully managed and crafted to ensure fidelity to the FGDM values and to ensure that those values drive practice. The following Six Core Elements are critical to supporting exemplary practice in FGDM:

  1. An independent (i.e., non-case carrying) coordinator is responsible for convening the family group meeting with agency personnel.
  2. The child protection agency personnel recognize the family group as their key decision-making partner, and time and resources are available to convene this group.
  3. Family groups have the opportunity to meet on their own, without the statutory authorities and other non-family members present, to work through the information they have been given and to formulate their responses and plans.
  4. When agency concerns are adequately addressed, preference is given to a family group’s plan over any other possible plan.
  5. Follow-up processes after the family group decision making meeting occur until the intended outcomes are achieved, to ensure that the plan continues to be relevant, current and achievable, because family group decision making is not a one-time event but an ongoing, active process.
  6. Referring agencies support family groups by providing the services and resources necessary to implement the agreed-upon plans.

About FGDM


FGDM recognizes the importance of involving family groups in decision making about children who need protection or care, and it can be initiated by child welfare agencies whenever a critical decision about a child is required. In FGDM processes, a trained coordinator who is independent of the case brings together the family group and the agency personnel to create and carry out a plan to safeguard children and other family members. FGDM processes position the family group to lead decision making, and the statutory authorities agree to support family group plans that adequately address agency concerns. The statutory authorities also organize service providers from governmental and non-governmental agencies to access resources for implementing the plans. FGDM processes actively seek the collaboration and leadership of family groups in crafting and implementing plans that support the safety, permanency and well-being of their children.

25+ Year Commitment to Family Group Leadership

We are committed to standing up these 8 principles in practice with families:

  1. Children have a right to maintain their kinship and cultural connections throughout their lives.
  2. Children and their parents belong to a wider family system that both nurtures them and is responsible for them.
  3. The family group, rather than the agency, is the context for child welfare and child protection resolutions.
  4. All families are entitled to the respect of the state, and the state needs to make an extra effort to convey respect to those who are poor, socially excluded, marginalized, or lacking power or access to resources and services.
  5. The state has a responsibility to recognize, support and build the family group’s capacity to protect and care for their young relatives.
  6. Family groups know their own histories, and they use that information to construct thorough plans.
  7. Active family group participation and leadership is essential for good outcomes for children, but power imbalances between family groups and child protection agency personnel must first be addressed.
  8. The state has a responsibility to defend family groups from unnecessary intrusion and to promote their growth and strength.

Resources

Please view the following PDF resources for more information on Family Group Decision Making:


Our Services


Support for Family Group Decision Making
and Other Family Engagement Approaches

For those wanting to bring FGDM and/or other family engagement approaches to their communities, we provide support thorough program, practice, and policy implementation, co-design, readiness and needs assessment, training, and evaluation.

Implementation Support

Our services first start with working with communities to design an implementation process that is grounded in the principles of implementation science. Our almost 30 years of experience has clearly demonstrated that when FGDM is implemented as an add-on practice, rather than a way of redesigning systems to position family leadership in decision-making, the values of the approach can be difficult to attain. In addition, sustaining this transformative system reform in inhospitable environments is precarious.

Our service array includes strategies that build a community’s capacity to implement, grow and sustain FGDM. This includes: in-person or virtual trainings, community forums or presentations, webinars, consultation, technical assistance, curriculum development on-the-job coaching that can occur either on-site or virtually. We offer continuing education units (CEUs) for many of our in-person trainings.

Implementation Planning

  • Co-design processes
  • Pre-implementation assessments
  • Securing staff and community support
  • Implementation science frameworks as a guide

Specialized Practice Development

  • Builds on fundamental knowledge/skills
  • Customized sessions on variety of needs/topics

Foundational Training

  • Fundamentals of family-involved decision making
  • Skills-building
  • Addressing power imbalances

Consultation, Coaching & Mentoring

  • Direct observation of coordinators, facilitators, and organization representatives
  • Feedback and consultation to guide/enhance practice

Sustainability Planning

  • Consultation
  • Continuous Quality Improvement
  • Train the Trainers
  • Ongoing learning opportunities to maintain fidelity

Program Evaluation/ Research

Answering challenging questions through:

  • Policy analyses
  • Qualitative analyses
  • Implementation studies
  • Outcome studies

FGDM Research Projects


Kempe-Led Evaluations on Family Group Decision Making

No Place Like Home: Family Group Decision Making for Children and Families Receiving In-Home Services  

View Final NPLH Report

Funder: U.S. Health and Human Services, Administration for Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau

A federal grant awarded to the American Humane Association (AHA), Casey Family Programs (CFP) and three innovative child welfare agencies with mature family group decision making (FGDM) programs to test the effectiveness of FGDM in safely preventing children from entering or re-entering foster care when they are receiving in-home services. The grant was transferred to the Larimer County Department of Human Services with the Kempe Center as the primary operating entity responsible for evaluation and technical assistance. The project sites are Larimer County Department of Human Services (LDHS), Colorado; South Dakota Department of Social Services (SDDSS); and Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (TDFPS). All three sites will participate in a rigorous evaluation (experimental or quasi-experimental), longitudinal designs addressing FGDM process, outcomes and cost effectiveness.

Resultant peer-reviewed publications

Maher, E., Allan, H., Merkel-Holguin, L., and Corwin, T. (Accepted, 2016). Using multi-site experimental and quasi-experimental designs to evaluate a common practice in child welfare. SAGE Research Methods.

Hollinshead, D., Corwin, T., Maher, E., Merkel-Holguin, L., Allan, H., and Fluke, J. (2017). Effectiveness of Family Group Conferencing in Preventing Repeat Referrals to Child Protective Services and Out-of-Home Placements. Child Abuse and Neglect, 69, 285-294. DOI information: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.022

Allan, H., Harlaar, N., Hollinshead, D., Drury, I., and Merkel-Holguin, L. (2017). The Impact of Worker and Agency Characteristics on FGC referrals in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review 8, 229-237.

Merkel-Holguin, L., Schwab-Reese, L., Drury, I., Allan, H., and Hollinshead, D. (2019). Nothing About Me, Without Me: Children’s Experiences with Family Group Conferences. Child and Family Social Work.

Corwin, T. W., Maher, E. J., Merkel-Holguin, L., Allan, H., Hollinshead, D. M., & Fluke, J. D. (2020). Increasing social support for child welfare-involved families through family group conferencing. The British Journal of Social Work. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz036

Found, Engaged and Connected for Olmsted County’s Most Vulnerable Youth

View FEC Final Report
View FEC Final Report Appendices

Funder: U.S. Health and Human Services, Administration for Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau

A federal grant awarded to Olmsted County Community Services to test the effectiveness of blending family group decision making and family finding for families involved with child welfare. Kempe conducted the implementation, outcome and cost evaluation of this program in Rochester, MN.

Permanency From Day 1

Project Description

The Permanency from Day One Grant (PFD1) project is funded by a $7.7 million cooperative agreement awarded to Washington State in 2018 by the Children’s Bureau. Washington State was one of just five states chosen for this grant and is the only public child welfare agency chosen as a grantee. This five-year grant began in October of 2018 and will end Sep. 30, 2024, after being awarded a one-year no cost extension.

The PFD1 project utilizes a data-driven approach to align and support the Program Improvement Plan (PIP) and Court Improvement Plan (CIP) while seeking to ameliorate systemic barriers to permanency for children and youth in Washington’s child welfare system by facilitating engagement between workers and families, including parents, youth, and extended kin. Through this increased engagement the project strives to achieve greater child and family involvement in case planning which will result in individualized case plans that meet the needs of children and families. Further, by engaging a wider family network earlier, the project seeks to increase the likelihood of permanent placements with kin. A rigorous and comprehensive external evaluation of the interventions is being conducted by the Kempe Center at the University of Colorado.

There are two target populations for the Permanency From Day One grant interventions:

  1. All families/cases in the intervention offices for whom a child/youth has become dependent during the intervention period.
  2. All “legally free” youth, statewide, who are not in their permanent home and are developmentally able to participate in choosing their potential permanent home.

Intervention #1 – Enhanced Permanency Planning Meetings

The first grant intervention is a random control trial that will provide Enhanced Permanency Planning Meetings for some Child and Family Welfare Services (CFWS) cases in offices participating in the grant. Eligible cases will be run through a randomization tool to determine if they will receive the Enhanced Permanency Planning Meetings or the office’s ‘business as usual’ permanency planning meetings.

Enhanced Permanency Planning Meetings will be scheduled, facilitated and documented by a neutral facilitator embedded in each intervention office, provided by the grant. This intervention will include an expedited timeline such that the first meeting will occur within 30 days of the establishment of dependency. Each successive meeting will occur within 90 days of the previous meeting. Meetings will continue to occur every 90 days throughout the life of the case until it is dismissed by the court.

Hypothesized benefits of Enhanced Permanency Planning Meetings include:

  • Increased understanding of the dependency process.
  • Clarification on roles and responsibilities.
  • An increase in kinship placement and family connections.
  • Inclusion and teaming.
  • Increased accountability.

Intervention #2 – Enhanced Youth Recruitment

The second grant intervention is Enhanced Youth Recruitment (EYR). This intervention will add to the ways in which DCYF recruits permanent homes for youth. The EYR strategy includes reverse matching, where profiles of foster parents will be shared with youth, allowing youth to help identify the family with whom they would like to live. EYR will have three reverse matching events each year. Matching events may be held virtually due to COVID.

EYR will also add a “recruitment plan” for each child needing recruitment of a permanent home. This plan will be documented in FamLink. DCYF case workers will continually update the court about the efforts DCYF is making to recruit permanent homes for the youth on their caseload.

Hypothesized benefits of EYR are:

  • Garnering buy-in from foster youth who will have more choice in their future family.
  • Increased ability for transparency and accountability for DCYF recruitment duties.
  • Creating new opportunities for foster families to put profiles out for review will increase matching.
  • Finalizing more permanent plans for foster youths and thereby shortening their length of stay.

Enhanced Family Conferencing Initiative

View EFCI Final Report

Funder: Subcontract from New York City ACS, via U.S. Health and Human Services, Administration for Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau

Three-year federal grant to study a family conferencing program implemented by the Administration for Children’s Services in the Bronx, New York. In addition to supporting evaluation design, provide coaching and training services to child welfare workforce.

Resultant peer-reviewed publications

Lalayants, M., DePanfilis, D., Merkel-Holguin, L., Baldwin, M., Schmidt, M., Treinen, J., Zuñiga, D., Mackereth, C. and Anderson, T. (2021). Building evidence for family group decision-making in child welfare: operationalizing the intervention. Journal of Public Child Welfare. 10.1080/15548732.2021.1891185.

Lalayants, M. & Merkel-Holguin, L. (2023). Adapting Private Family Time in Child Protective Services Decision-Making Processes. Child & Family Social Work. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12999


History of FGDM


In 2012, the Kempe Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse and Neglect assumed leadership for the National Center on Family Group Decision Making, which has mission to build community capacity to implement high-quality, effective FGDM processes that are philosophically congruent with the central values and beliefs of this approach. The National Center on FGDM’s home at the Kempe Center at the University of Colorado School of Medicine is very fitting. Almost forty years ago, in 1976, the Kempe Center’s founder, Dr. C. Henry Kempe, promoted the idea that when children are abused or neglected, it is important to work with the entire family.

Since its’ inception in 1999, the National Center on FGDM has been a leader in promoting the integration of FGDM philosophy and processes into system that work with vulnerable children and families. We have supported over 300 communities in the implementation of FGDM, including training and consultation, technical assistance, and coaching and evaluation support. As evidenced by our activities, the National Center on FGDM serves to create links, share resources, and provide various services to broaden knowledge about this way of reorganizing systems to work differently with families. We strive to disseminate this information through this dedicated website on FGDM, and by hosting an annual international conference and webinar series on FGDM and other family engagement approaches.

Our team has served as supervisors, coordinators, facilitators, training and coaching masters, practitioners, and program implementers in, and evaluators of, FGDM. Our team looks forward to supporting your community.


Contact FGDM


For questions regarding Family Group Decision Making, please contact:

Lisa Merkel-Holguin
Director of the Kempe Center’s National Center on Family Group Decision Making
[email protected]

CMS Login