Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is a molecular cytogenomic test for detecting both copy number changes (deletions and duplications) and copy-neutral absence of heterozygosity (AOH) .
Indications for CMA
Test Uses
CMA can be used for detection of the following genomic changes:
Follow-Up Testing
CGL often recommends follow-up studies to further elucidate positive CMA results. Recommendations, if any, appear in the proband’s result report. Follow-up testing may include:
Limitations
CMA will NOT detect balanced rearrangements (i.e. inversions, translocations, etc.), heterodisomy, or reliably identify low-level mosaicism (below ~20%). For mosaic conditions, CMA cannot differentiate between specific number of copies present (e.g. trisomy of a whole chromosome arm vs. tetrasomy in 50% of cells tested). It also does not detect deletions and duplications with limited probe coverage, gene expansions, variants within mitochondrial DNA, or single nucleotide variants/polymorphisms. CNVs that are smaller than the resolution of the CMA may not be detected or reported. CNVs determined to be benign or likely benign are not reported. Typically, carrier status is not reported unless possibly relevant to the patient’s reported symptoms to guide further testing. Contact the laboratory if there is a specific region or gene(s) of interest.
CMA may reveal whole genome mosaicism suggestive of presence of two different genomes, as in the case of maternal cell contamination. The presence of maternal cell contamination may limit the interpretation of CMA results. For products of conception or placenta, when a single female genome is detected, it is assumed to represent the female fetus. However, the possibility that the specimen analyzed is maternal in origin cannot be excluded; MCC testing (see below) is required to rule out this possibility.
Reporting Thresholds
| Finding | Reportable Size* |
|---|---|
| Loss/Deletion | 1 Mb or larger |
| Gain/Duplication | 2 Mb or larger |
| Absence of Heterozygosity | 10 Mb or larger always reported 3 Mb and larger are analyzed and may be reported if the total AOH is 5% or greater |
*Smaller AOH or copy number variants may be reported if likely to have relevant clinical significance.
Methods
Extracted DNA is processed on the Illumina® Infinium Global Diversity bead array. The Infinium Global Diversity bead array targets approximately 4885 genes in accordance with the most recent ICCG recommendations. The Infinium Global Diversity bead array is scanned on Illumina’s iScan Platform. Using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) probes, the array can detect genomic copy number losses and gains, known as copy number variants (CNVs), with a resolution of approximately 5 kb across the genome. NxClinical software (Bionano Inc.) is used to analyze and interpret the data. CNVs devoid of relevant gene content or that are common CNVs in the general population (listed in the Database of Genomic Variants) may not be reported. Due to probe placement on the chromosomal microarray (CMA), the smallest size CNV that is detectable is variable by region.
Genomic linear positions are given relative to the Genome Reference Consortium Human Genome build 37 (hg19) released by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). CNVs are analyzed using publicly available databases and literature. See the following references regarding CMA analysis, interpretation, and reporting: PMID: 31690835, 34131312, 34906464, 27875474.
Turn Around Time
7-21 days
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detects chromosome copy number changes and specific, submicroscopic genomic copy number changes such as deletions and duplications. Pregnancy loss Aneuploidy FISH probes for chromosome abnormalities often seen in products of conception include X, Y, 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, and 22.
Indications
Limitations
FISH is not considered a diagnostic test. FISH probes bind to a specific loci in the genome and can provide a preliminary copy number assessment of an area of interest. However, several factors may lead to inaccurate FISH results. Co-localized signals, interrupted binding sites, very small copy number variants, and other events contribute to occasional false positives and false negatives.
In cases of pregnancy loss, FISH is offered as a final option if CMA testing has failed. Positive/abnormal FISH results are assumed to indicate a whole chromosome aneuploidy given the context of pregnancy loss, but partial chromosome aneuploidy, chromosome rearrangements, or other complex situations with additional medical implications cannot be ruled out. A single copy of the chromosome 22 probe may indicate 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome and parental testing would be recommended. Trisomy or monosomy of chromosomes other than 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y are not evaluated by this assay.
Occasionally, FISH may be recommended to clarify the results of a CMA. Such additional recommendations will be discussed with the ordering provider prior to being performed.
Turn Around Time
1-3 days
Various methods of prenatal specimen collection pose an increased risk for maternal cell contamination (MCC) including chorionic villi samples (CVS), products of conception, and other placental specimens. Such contamination can result in ambiguous or even unusable results if not clarified. When not excluded by other test results, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) recommend that MCC testing be performed to optimize interpretation of the primary molecular and/or cytogenetic results (Nagan, et al. 2011).
Indications
Methods
A blood or buccal specimen from the person who carried the pregnancy is required for MCC testing and may be submitted along with the pregnancy loss specimen.
MCC testing by short tandem repeat (STR) analysis is performed by Colorado Molecular Correlates Laboratory (CMOCO), a partner laboratory of Colorado Genetics Laboratory (CGL).
MCC is performed when requested depending on the specimen provided. MCC testing is typically performed concurrently with CMA, and as a reflex analysis if XX or mosaic XX results are found in the proband specimen. The decision of when and if to run MCC analysis is made in conjunction with the ordering provider.
For additional information, contact CGL Client Services at (303)724-5701.
Send Out
Colorado Genetics Laboratory can send extracted DNA to other laboratories for additional molecular or biochemical studies upon request.
To coordinate send-out, the following items MUST be provided before a specimen can be shipped:
If a specimen is not of adequate quantity for all testing orders and send out, CGL will contact the ordering provider for a priority of testing.
| ACCEPTABLE SPECIMENS | UNACCEPTABLE SPECIMENS |
| Send 1 cm3 of any of the following specimens: | Specimens will be mailed back without testing: |
|
|
Collection Instructions
All specimens must be labeled with the patient’s name and a second identifier (e.g. DOB, MRN).
| TEST | VOLUME | CPT |
| CMA | 1 cm3 tissue (see acceptable tissue list) | 81229 |
| Pregnancy Loss Aneuploidy FISH (part of a reflex pathway with CMA) | No additional specimen needed | 1088271 x 2, 88271 x 7, 88274 x 4, 88291 |
| Maternal Cell Contamination (MCC) Testing | Peripheral Blood: 3 mL in EDTA tube Buccal Swab* | Specimen must be from the person carrying the pregnancy. Billed by outside laboratory. |
| Send Out | See reference laboratory's extracted DNA requirements | 99001 |
*Buccal swab kits are available by request.
Committee on Genetics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Committee Opinion No.682: Microarrays and Next-Generation Sequencing Technology: The Use of Advanced Genetic Diagnostic Tools in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):e262-e268. PMID: 27875474.
Gonzales PR, et al. Interpretation and reporting of large regions of homozygosity and suspected consanguinity/uniparental disomy, 2021 revision: A technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2022 Feb;24(2):255-261. Epub 2021 Dec 3. PMID: 34906464.
Nagan N, et al. Laboratory guidelines for detection, interpretation, and reporting of maternal cell contamination in prenatal analyses a report of the association for molecular pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2011 Jan;13(1):7-11. Epub 2010 Dec 23. PMID: 21227389; PMCID: PMC3069929.
Riggs ER, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2020 Feb;22(2):245-257. Epub 2019 Nov 6. Erratum in: Genet Med. 2021 Nov;23(11):2230. PMID: 31690835; PMCID: PMC7313390.
Shao L, et al. Chromosomal microarray analysis, including constitutional and neoplastic disease applications, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2021 Oct;23(10):1818-1829. Epub 2021 Jun 15. PMID: 34131312.
Wapner RJ, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 6;367(23):2175-84. PMID: 23215555; PMCID: PMC3549418.
Reddy UM, et al. Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 6;367(23):2185-93. PMID: 23215556; PMCID: PMC4295117.